COBRA and Active Duty: What Employers Need to Know

COBRA and Active Duty: What Employers Need to Know

When a former employee receiving COBRA coverage is called to active military duty, employers may wonder how COBRA and USERRA apply. Here’s a quick breakdown of your obligations.

What is COBRA?

COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) allows employees and their families to continue group health coverage for a limited time after job loss or other qualifying events.

What is USERRA?

USERRA (Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act) protects the job and benefit rights of employees who leave work for military service. It includes health coverage continuation—but only for active employees, not those already separated and on COBRA.

Does USERRA Apply in This Case?

No. If the individual is no longer employed and is receiving COBRA, USERRA does not provide additional rights.

Can COBRA Be Terminated Due to TRICARE?

This is a gray area:

  • IRS rules suggest COBRA may end if the person gains other group coverage (like TRICARE).
  • DOL guidance says COBRA should not be terminated just because TRICARE is in place.
What Should Employers Do?
  • Don’t automatically terminate COBRA due to TRICARE.
  • Check with your insurer or stop-loss carrier to avoid coverage gaps.
  • Document your decisions and stay updated on federal guidance.

USERRA doesn’t apply to former employees, but COBRA coverage should generally continue—even if TRICARE is now active. When unsure, consult legal or benefits experts to stay compliant.

Source: Thomson Reuters

COBRA and Active Duty: What Employers Need to Know

What Happens to Qualified Transportation Plan Balances When an Employee Leaves?

Qualified transportation fringe benefits are a popular way for employers to support commuting costs while offering tax advantages. But what happens to unused balances when an employee leaves the company? If you’re considering implementing a qualified transportation plan, it’s crucial to understand the IRS rules governing these benefits—especially regarding terminations.

Key IRS Rules for Transportation Plans

Two primary IRS rules shape how balances are treated upon termination:

  1. No-Former-Employees Rule
    Qualified transportation plans cannot reimburse expenses incurred after employment ends. This means terminated employees are ineligible for post-employment transit reimbursements.
  2. No-Refunds Rule
    Unused balances—whether from employer contributions or pre-tax salary reductions—cannot be refunded to the employee. These funds must remain within the plan.

What Can Terminated Employees Do?

Employees who leave the company can still submit reimbursement requests for qualified transportation expenses incurred during employment, as long as they do so within the plan’s run-out period—a grace period for submitting claims after coverage ends.

However, if they:

  • Don’t have enough eligible expenses,
  • Miss the run-out deadline, or
  • Have excess contributions,

…those unused funds are forfeited.

Minimizing Forfeiture Risk Through Plan Design

Employers can reduce forfeiture risk by designing the plan thoughtfully. For example:

  • Limit monthly contributions to the cost of a transit pass.
  • Send regular reminders to employees about their balances and deadlines.
  • Allow election changes to avoid over-contributing.

What Happens to Forfeited Funds?

Your plan document should clearly state how forfeited balances are handled. Options include:

  • Retaining funds to cover plan administration costs.
  • Redistributing funds to other participants (within IRS limits).
  • Complying with state escheat laws, especially if the plan is “funded” (i.e., money held in separate accounts).

Qualified transportation plans offer great benefits, but they come with strict IRS rules. By understanding the limitations and designing your plan carefully, you can support your employees while minimizing forfeitures and compliance risks.

COBRA and Active Duty: What Employers Need to Know

Are TPA-Administered Health FSAs Subject to HIPAA? What Employers Need to Know

As employers prepare to offer health flexible spending accounts (FSAs), a common question arises: Are health FSAs administered by third-party administrators (TPAs) subject to HIPAA’s privacy and security rules? The short answer is yes—and here’s why that matters.

Understanding HIPAA’s Scope for Health FSAs

Under HIPAA, a health FSA is considered a group health plan, which makes it a covered entity subject to HIPAA’s privacy and security rules. The only exception is for self-administered FSAs with fewer than 50 participants—a rare scenario for most employers.

If your company uses a TPA to manage FSA claims, this exception does not apply. That means your health FSA must comply with HIPAA’s full privacy and security requirements.

Why Fully Insured Plans Are Different

Employers with fully insured major medical plans often take a “hands-off” approach to protected health information (PHI), receiving only summary or enrollment data. This limits their HIPAA obligations because the insurer, not the employer, handles PHI.

However, most health FSAs are self-insured, and the “hands-off” exception doesn’t apply. Even if a TPA handles the day-to-day administration, your company is still responsible for HIPAA compliance.

What Employers Must Do

To comply with HIPAA when offering a TPA-administered health FSA, employers should:

  • Enter into a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with the TPA, outlining how PHI will be handled.
  • Implement privacy and security policies for the health FSA.
  • Limit internal access to PHI to only those who need it for plan administration.
  • Train staff who may come into contact with PHI.
  • Ensure electronic PHI (ePHI) is protected under HIPAA’s security rule.
Minimizing Risk and Burden

While you can’t avoid HIPAA obligations entirely, you can minimize your exposure by delegating as much as possible to the TPA. This reduces the amount of PHI your company accesses and simplifies compliance.

If your company is offering a health FSA administered by a TPA, you are subject to HIPAA’s privacy and security rules. Taking proactive steps to comply—especially by working closely with your TPA—will help protect employee data and reduce legal risk.

Source: Thomson Reuters

COBRA and Active Duty: What Employers Need to Know

Midyear Cafeteria Plan Election Changes: Financial Hardship and Health FSAs

Navigating cafeteria plans can be tricky for both employers and employees. A common question is whether financial hardship allows midyear election changes to health FSAs. Unfortunately, it doesn’t.

Why Financial Hardship Isn’t a Qualifying Event

IRS rules state that cafeteria plan elections are irrevocable for the plan year unless a qualifying event occurs. Financial hardship, such as buying a new house and facing unexpected expenses, does not qualify as a permitted election change event.

Qualifying Events for Election Changes

The IRS outlines specific events that allow for midyear election changes, including:

  • Change in marital status
  • Change in the number of dependents
  • Change in employment status
  • Significant cost or coverage changes (not applicable to health FSAs)
  • Qualified medical child support orders

Since financial hardship does not fall under these categories, employees must wait until the next open enrollment period to make changes to their health FSA elections.

Communicating Plan Rules

To minimize confusion and potential employee relations issues, employers should clearly communicate the rules and limitations of their cafeteria plans. Providing real-life examples can help employees understand which events qualify for election changes and which do not. This proactive approach can prevent misunderstandings and ensure employees are well-informed.

Plan Design Considerations

Employers may also consider redesigning their health FSA plans to eliminate midyear election changes altogether, except in cases of qualified medical child support orders. This can simplify plan administration and reduce the challenges associated with determining coverage amounts for the remainder of the plan year.

While financial hardship is a difficult situation for any employee, it does not justify a midyear election change to a health FSA under current IRS rules. Employers can support their employees by providing clear communication about plan rules and considering plan design adjustments to streamline administration. By taking these steps, employers can help ensure a smooth and compliant operation of their cafeteria plans.

Source: Thomson Reuters